The estimate of total GDP for the fisheries sector updates the 2005-estimate of the fisheries contribution

to GDP of US$0.6B [5], and indeed increases the estimate with a factor of five. It also learn more exceeds the 2008-gross value of the fisheries exports of US$2.4B, (which does not consider costs), [5]. The increased estimate of contribution to GDP was higher than the previous estimate, partly because it was for 2009 rather than 2005, and partly because of the much more comprehensive description of the fisheries sector that was derived here. Fisheries have always been important in Peru for providing livelihood and food, and this is still the case. The total employment in the fisheries sector was here estimated to 232,000 jobs (full time), which exceeds

the previous estimate from FAO of 145,000 (full and part time) with more than 50%. Yet, the estimate should be considered conservative, as the study did not account for all parts of the fisheries sector. The estimate of the total sector employment was lower than that of Teh and Sumaila [28], who estimated the employment to 440,000±200,000 jobs. As the estimate for primary sector employment (79,500 jobs) derived here was close to the estimate (72,000 jobs) of Teh and Sumaila [28] the difference was in the higher multiplier used in their study (6.1 vs. 2.9 in the present study). Among enterprise types, the anchoveta-based industry Trichostatin A cell line is not the leading employer – fishmeal plants only provided 5% of the jobs in the industry (Table 1). Instead, fish restaurants dominated with 35% of the employment, followed by freezing and canning plants with 8% and 7%, respectively. By categories, the retailer section was dominating with 45% of the jobs, followed by the primary sector (producers) responsible for 32% of the total employment, and processing with 20% (Table 2). There were only males employed in the primary sector;

the 10 women that were estimated to be working in the sector work with guano processing, (which we have lumped with guano extraction) Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase (Table 2). In the processing sector there was a 50–50 split between males and females, and in the retailer section there was a small dominance of females with 57% of the total. Overall, however, the total fisheries sector was male-dominated with 64% of the total employment. The study followed the fish products from the primary sector through to the consumers and could therefore be used to evaluate for each fishing fleet how much it contributed to the economy and the employment. This is illustrated in Table 3, from which it is clear that more than half of the GDP contribution came from the steel (34%), artisanal (15%), and wooden (5%) purse seiners. There are numerous species that contribute to this, with anchoveta being the most important. The economic multipliers from the primary sector to the entire fisheries sector varied around an average of 2.