Because each journal has its unique system for managing submissions, there may be several ways that these reporting requirements will be integrated into the manuscript flow. Some journals will make adherence to reporting criteria and associated checklists

mandatory for all submissions. Other journals may require them only when the article is closer to acceptance for publication. In any case, the onus will be on the author not only to ensure the inclusion of the appropriate reporting criteria but also to document evidence of inclusion through the use of the reporting guideline checklists. Authors should consult the Instructions for Authors this website of participating journals for more information. We hope that simultaneous implementation of this new reporting requirement will send a strong message to all disability and rehabilitation researchers of the need to adhere to the highest standards when performing and disseminating research. Although we expect that there will be

growing pains with this process, we hope that within a short period, researchers will begin to use these guidelines during the design phases of their research, thereby improving their methods. The potential benefits to authors are obvious: articles are improved through superior reporting of a study’s design and methods, and the usefulness of the article to readers is enhanced. Reporting guidelines also allow

for greater transparency in reporting how studies were conducted and can help, hopefully, during the peer review process to expose GSK2118436 misleading or selective reporting. Reporting guidelines are an important tool to assist authors in the structural development selleck screening library of a manuscript, eventually allowing an article to realize its full potential. Leighton Chan, MD, MPH Allen W. Heinemann, PhD Co-Editors-in-Chief Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Jason Roberts, PhD Origin Editorial Acknowledgments As this issue went to press, the following Editors agreed to participate in the initiative to mandate reporting guidelines and publish this Position Statement in their respective journals. As a collective group, we encourage others to adopt these guidelines and welcome them to share this editorial with their readerships. • Sharon A. Gutman, PhD, OTR Editor-in-Chief “
“The authors of the article would like to inform readers that the references to ‘kinesio tape’ and ‘kinesio taping’ throughout the article should have read ‘kinesiology tape’ and ‘kinesiology taping’. The authors apologise for the errors. “
“Effective communication between healthcare professionals and patients is crucial for a successful clinical encounter (Gask and Usherwood, 2002) and impacts upon every patient contact.