In one series, all four tones were drawn from the same harmonic whereas in the other they alternated between an inharmonic and harmonic complex. The harmonic tone complex had a fundamental frequency of 100 Hz, whereas the inharmonic complex had the same fundamental frequency but with each component shifted by the same amount (Δf). A harmonic complex with a 100-Hz fundamental frequency was used as it consists of components

with frequencies around 1000 Hz, where frequency discrimination was measured in Experiment 1. Both complexes had the same harmonic envelope equal to a fundamental frequency of 100 Hz but with different TFS. In each trial, one interval, selected at random, contained the harmonic complex CDK inhibitor and the other contained the inharmonic complex. Intervals were indicated by numbered BGB324 molecular weight flashing boxes presented onscreen coincident with the presentation of the complexes. Subjects clicked with a computer mouse on the box corresponding to the interval containing the inharmonic tones. Following Moore & Sęk (2009), the duration of each complex was 200 ms and the two complexes were separated by a 300-ms interval. Feedback was given after each trial, with the selected observation period flashing either

green for correct or red for incorrect. At the start of each block, Δf was set at 50 Hz and was adapted according to response. Again following Moore & Sęk (2009), blocks were terminated following eight reversals, and the threshold for the block was taken as the arithmetic mean of Δf for the last six reversals. To prevent subjects discriminating on place coding, all components were passed through a fixed band-pass filter set centered at 900 Hz with a width of 110 Hz rolling on at 30 dB per octave. Threshold equalizing noise, presented 15 dB below stimulus presentation level (SPL) and extending from 50 to 11 050 Hz, was used to mask components of the complexes falling outside the band-pass filter.

Following Moore & Sęk (2009), SPL for the harmonic complex was set 20 dB SPL above each subject’s 70.7% absolute threshold measured using an adaptive 2I-2AFC staircase method for 900 Hz immediately prior to each session. The sampled point of the psychometric function of absolute threshold was changed from Experiment 2A for consistency with previously established measures of TFS. To give consistent performance, subjects almost had one initial training session prior to testing where they practised the TFS task for ~45 min. There were two counterbalanced TFS testing sessions after training where either anodal or sham tDCS was applied, separated by a week to avoid any carry-over effects of stimulation. Subjects completed seven threshold procedures during the 20 min of either tDCS or sham stimulation. Each staircase lasted ~2 min, varying with the subject’s response times and number of trials needed for six reversals. The threshold for that session was taken as the arithmetic mean of the seven thresholds for the session, each of which lasted approximately 35 min.