Also, there remains the problem of emergence of antimicrobial resistance as well as high re-infection rates. However, the conclusion of Toyokawa T et al.11 accentuates the fact that the European Helicobacter Study Group and the Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research have recommended H. pylori eradication therapy in patients with atrophic gastritis. “
“The most

important factor contributing to a top-class biomedical journal is the quality of the articles it publishes, their contributions to new knowledge, better understanding of disease and its treatment, click here and their relevance to the improved standards of patient care that we all seek to promulgate. Attracting those articles from authors, selecting the best and editing them for further improvement is the painstaking task of reviewers and editors. It is a time-consuming task that relies on the experience, fairness, expertise and creativity of those involved, and also their generosity and belief in the peer-review system that underpins academic excellence, our science and profession. While JGH no longer lists reviewers each year, your contribution is noted and greatly find more appreciated. What may be less well-known is that our hardest-working reviewers, those who consistently review 5 or more manuscripts every year as well as writing for us frequently, are all members of the Editorial Board.

Your names are clearly printed inside the front cover of each issue, and your sterling (in some cases, stellar!) contribution is hugely valued. Ably supported by our reviewers and Editorial Board members, the Editors of JGH need to apply the same

qualities to building a great this website journal, and also additional ones – like wisdom and judgment! Each Editor needs to tackle a constant stream of manuscripts to make timely decisions; each handles about 100 manuscripts a year. They are therefore conducting JGH business multiple times every week of the year. Indeed, it is evident to me that some of them conduct JGH business virtually every day of the year! Selecting which manuscripts should be sent out to our hardworking reviewers and Editorial Board members, nominating and inviting appropriate reviewers, occasionally chasing up those who are incommunicado or tardy, making judgments on discrepant reviewer reports or borderline articles (we only accept ∼12% of articles submitted to us), then finally improving the wording of titles, imperfections of English expression, unwieldy figures and tables all takes time as well as expertise. Editors also contribute substantially to the selection and writing of editorials and high quality review articles, attracting the best original articles for JGH (including some of their own), and developing and promulgating high ethical standards in research and publishing as required by this Journal. The effort of the team of JGH Editors over the last 5 years or so has been outstanding.