Fair: Evidence is sufficient to determine effects on outcomes, but the strength of the evidence is limited by the number, quality or consistency of the individual studies, i.e. studies that did not meet the criteria for either good or poor and met some but not all quality criteria. Poor: Evidence is insufficient to assess the effects on outcomes because of limited number or power of studies,

important flaws in their design or conduct, gaps in the chain of evidence or lack of information. Criteria were: a retrospective study, study duration of less than 1 year, not population based, inadequate definition of fracture and abstract only available or no definition of ethnicities provided where relevant. Where assessment find more was not possible, the study was discarded. Selection criteria From the publications available, one dataset CH5424802 price was chosen to characterise hip fracture risk in that country which could be

a single study or the mean of several studies where appropriate. Criteria for selecting a study or studies over others to represent a country are listed below and details are provided in the Appendix. 1. FRAX model available   2. National rather than regional data   3. Higher quality   4. Most recent study   5. Mean of several regional estimates   6. Sole study available   7. Additional

details supplied by the author, see notes in tables   Where a FRAX model was available for a particular country, the hip fracture rates used for FRAX were selected since these used recent data were available and had been PLEKHM2 vetted previously for quality or consistency [13, 14]. Notwithstanding, recent publications, appearing between May 2010 and November 2011 (search cut-off dates) were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the data used for the FRAX models. In the case of China, more recent regional data had been published [15] and were preferentially selected for this report. For Belgium, we used more extensive national estimates (2005–2007 rather than 2006) supplied by the same author [16, 17], M Hiligsmann 2011, personal communication]. For Italy, we used recent national data for 2007 [18] rather than the four regional estimates used in FRAX (version 3.4) [14]. In the absence of a FRAX model, national studies were preferred over regional estimates. For regional estimates, the most recent and higher quality studies were preferred.