Major projections

of LHb neurons target the dopaminergic ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the serotonergic dorsal (DR) and median raphe nuclei (MnR). Both monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems play a central role in reward processing and reward-related decision-making. Glutamatergic LHb efferents terminate on GABAergic neurons in the VTA, the rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg), and the raphe nuclei, thereby suppressing monoamine release when required by the present behavioral context. Recent studies suggest that the LHb exerts a strong tonic inhibition on monoamine release when no reward is to be obtained. It is yet unknown whether this inhibition Selleck BVD-523 is the result of a continuous external activation by other brain areas, or if it is intrinsically generated by LHb projection neurons. To analyze

whether the tonic inhibition may be the result of a hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotid-gated cation channel (HCN)-mediated pacemaker activity of LHb projection neurons, we combined retrograde tracing in rats with in situ hybridization of HCN1 to HCN4 mRNAs. In fact, close to all LHb neurons targeting VIA or raphe nuclei are equipped with HCN subunit mRNAs. While HCN1 mRNA BMS345541 is scarce, most neurons display strong expression of HCN2 to HCN4 mRNAs, in line with the potential formation of hetero-meric channels. These results are supported by quantitative PCR and immunocytochemical analyses. Thus, our data suggest that the tonic inhibition of monoamine release is intrinsically generated in LHb projection neurons and that their activity may only be modulated by synaptic inputs to the LHb. (C) 2011 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Objective:

Previous studies comparing atomoxetine and methylphenidate to treat ADHD symptoms have been equivocal. This noninferiority meta-analysis compared core ADHD symptom response between atomoxetine and methylphenidate in children and adolescents. Method: Selection criteria included randomized, controlled design; duration 6 weeks; and assessment of ADHD Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator Administered and Scored (ADHDRS) scores. Six-week response rates, defined as >= 40% reduction in ADHDRS total score, were compared using a noninferiority margin of -15%. Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria (N = 1,368). After 6 weeks, 53.6% (95% confidence interval AZD0530 order [CI] 48.6%-58.4%) of atomoxetine-treated patients (n = 811) had responded compared with 54.4% (47.6%-61.1%) for methylphenidate (n = 557), with atomoxetine demonstrating noninferiority to methylphenidate (absolute difference -0.9%, 95% CI -9.2%-7.5%). Conclusion: After 6 weeks of treatment atomoxetine and methylphenidate had comparable efficacy in reducing core ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents. (J. of Att. Dis. 2011; 15(8) 674-683)”
“Therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) has markedly changed in the past decade with the introduction of new drugs, but it is not clear whether the improvements have been sustained.