1; also Lomber et al., 2006). Subjects were evaluated at regular intervals and assessed in terms of hemispace and eccentricity-specific recovery. Task specificity and stability of recovery over time in the absence of active rTMS treatment was also addressed. A group of adult cats (n = 15, 13 females, 2 males) were used in this study. Animals were acquired from Selleckchem GSKJ4 a USDA-approved licensed breeder (Liberty Laboratories, Waverly, NY, USA). Cats were maintained on a 12:12-h light : dark cycle, were group-housed

in an enriched environment and had free access to water. Food intake was regulated to daily testing sessions and to a period at the end of the day when cats were fed dry food. All procedures were conducted ICG-001 purchase with approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Boston University School of Medicine, and were in compliance

with the policies outlined by the National Research Council Guidelines for the Care and Use of Mammals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research (2003). In this study, a battery of three visuospatial detection tasks performed in real space were used to probe potential rTMS-driven improvements in behavioral performance. All paradigms were tested by placing subjects in the center of an 88-cm-diameter semicircular perimetry arena (Schweid et al., 2008). Animals first fixated on a midline stimulus at 0° for a variable period of time (between 1 and 3 s). This event was followed by a peripheral stimulus randomly appearing at 15, 30, Palmatine 45, 60, 75 or 90° of visual angles in

either the left or right hemifield at the level of the horizontal meridian. Animals were trained to acknowledge the appearance of the target by orienting head and eyes to the exact target eccentricity in a single motion and then move forward in a straight trajectory to the stimulus and retrieve a high-incentive food reward (‘wet’ food). When the presence of a peripheral target was not acknowledged (or neglected) animals were trained to provide the ‘default’ response of advancing forward to the 0° midline fixation to receive a low-incentive food reward (‘dry’ food). Once a trial was completed, animals were trained to quickly return to the starting point, re-establish central fixation and prepare for a new trial. Correct animal head and eye positions and the trajectory of the response were monitored online through a closed video-camera system that provided a magnified high-resolution view of the animals’ head and eyes. Targets were presented in pseudorandom order in blocks of 28 trials with an equivalent number of stimuli displayed in the two hemifields. In addition, up to 10 catch trials, which consisted of the presentation of the midline stimulus alone, were interleaved within each block to ensure correct execution of the paradigms.