[18,28–32] However, only three of the 13 research papers had been published in an indexed journal.[18,29,31] Six conference abstracts or papers were identified, with four having used a qualitative approach[33–36] and two a quantitative approach[37,38] to the research. In total six of the studies Tofacitinib included in this review (i.e. from the 13 papers and six conference abstracts mentioned above) evaluated CPD as part of another programme or intervention related to CPD and learning.[23,24,36,38] Two news items reporting the outcome of RPSGB surveys were also included in this review[39,40] as was the report of a relatively recent RPSGB-commissioned study by the Professional
Associations Research Network (PARN) consultancy firm (which compared data with other professionals surveyed at the same time).[41] None of the 22 studies that had met the inclusion criteria were excluded on the basis of quality alone, but quality was expressed as the number of QARI criteria met by each study and also considered in the discussion of our findings. The facilitators and barriers to CPD were grouped into eight broad categories of time, financial costs and resource issues, understanding of CPD, facilitation and support for CPD, motivation and interest in CPD, attitudes
towards compulsory CPD, system constraints, and technical problems as described below. A summary of the findings is presented in Box 1. Time is seen as a strong barrier to pharmacy professionals’ participation in click here CPD. The (non)availability of time is a very strong and constant theme that appears throughout the decade
in most of the studies examined (see Table 2). The main concern expressed by pharmacists was that CPD takes time to conduct and document and that, in the absence of protected CPD time at work, time itself becomes a barrier to CPD.[26] This is especially in the context of people whose personal lives take a higher priority over CPD, or whose high workload simply means learning outside of work hours Histone demethylase (e.g. in the evening) becomes unfeasible.[26,33] Time as a barrier also featured in the two studies focused on technician views.[27,38] A lower proportion of pharmacy professionals who responded to the PARN survey conducted CPD at work compared to other professionals surveyed, with a higher proportion of the pharmacy respondents conducting CPD in personal time.[41] Lack of financial support, for example to enable the employment of a locum to cover for time taken out of work for CPD, was also seen as a barrier to participation in CPD (see Table 3) and in one study there was a suggestion that part-time workers[22] and in two studies that locums themselves particularly lost out on employer help in this way.[22,33] This was juxtaposed with a minority view expressed in one study that development should take place in one’s own time.