212, p = .076). Using an adaptation of Steiger’s Z test ( Hoerger, 2013 and Steiger, 1980), ICG-001 we found the two correlations between F1 and anxiety and F2 and anxiety to be significantly different from each other (ZH = −2.86, p = .004). Total hardiness and all its domains correlated significantly with anxiety (Total: r = −.568, p = <.001; Commitment: r = .−471, p < .001; Control r = −.363, p = .002, Challenge: r = −.280, p = .019). Multiple mediation analyses,

with commitment, control and challenge as mediators, were performed to investigate the indirect effect of psychopathy on anxiety through hardiness (see Fig. 1). No significant direct relationship was found, neither between PCL-R F1 and anxiety nor between PCL-R F2 and anxiety. Significant indirect effects of both PCL-R factors were found, partly mediated through the commitment facet of DRS-15-R. All indirect effects are reported in Table 2. Since only the commitment dimension of psychological hardiness contributed

significantly to the mediation of the relationship between psychopathy and anxiety, a simple mediation model was then calculated to assess the effect size of commitment as a mediator. The indirect effect of commitment in this simple model was −.079 for F1 and .159 for F2 (BootLLCI [95% CI] = -.260, BootULCI [95% CI] = −.024, k2 = .112 for F1; BootLLCI [95% CI] = .048, selleckchem BootULCI [95% CI] = .324, k2 = .155 for F2). Kelley’s Kappa-Squared (k2; Hayes, 2013) was used as a measure of effect size. It is interpreted as the indirect effect relative to its maximum possible value in the data, and the measure is bound between 0 and 1, with values closer to 1 signifying bigger effects ( Hayes, 2013 and Preacher and Kelley, 2011). As a deprivation of liberty, imprisonment is believed to be perceived as unpleasant, and incarceration as a major life event has also been linked to illnesses associated with stress (Massoglia, 2008). Since both psychopathy and psychological hardiness have been associated with the ability to remain relatively unaffected by daily stressors, this study examined

how the characteristics of psychological hardiness were PDK4 related to, and possibly mediated, the relationship between psychopathy and anxiety. Our initial correlational analysis did not reveal any significant relationship between the total score for psychopathy and anxiety. When psychopathy was divided into the separate dimensions of the two-factor model, however, a negative relationship emerged between F1 and anxiety. A positive, but not significant relationship was also found between F2 and anxiety. While these correlations are not significant at the conventional p < .05 level, they are significantly different from each other and also consistent with other studies ( Hansen et al., 2013 and Harpur et al., 1989). Moreover, a one-tailed analysis yields a significant correlation (p = .025/p = .038).