All participants were instructed to count mentally in their native language. A numeric keypad appeared on the screen and asked the participant to enter a number at three random times during each trial, and then again at the end of the

trial (minimum of 15 s and maximum of 80 s between keypad screens; Fig. 1A). find more Each trial thus provided four numeric answers that served to analyse subject performance. If no numeric answer was entered within 9 s, the keypad disappeared (this happened five times out of 480 total keypads across all participants). In these cases, we interpolated the number of mental calculation steps using the nearest-neighbor method). In the Easy and Difficult tasks, participants were instructed to enter the value of their current mental calculation (Fig. 1A). In the Control task, participants were instructed to enter any number they wanted to. Participants’ eye position was calibrated at the beginning of the experimental session, and re-calibrated after each break. We used custom code and the Psychophysics Toolbox (Brainard, 1997; Pelli, 1997; Kleiner et al., 2007) to generate/display visual stimuli. For one participant, the pupil was lost during the fourth block

of the experiment. This amounted to a total of three trials Paclitaxel purchase (one Control, one Easy and one Difficult) of 3 min each. For this participant, we replaced the missing microsaccade rate, microsaccade

magnitude and microsaccade peak velocity values with the average values from the corresponding conditions in the other five blocks (Roth, 1994). In the Easy task, a correct answer was defined as any even number that was higher than the starting number, or the previously entered number on the keypad. In click here the Difficult task, a correct answer was defined as any number that was smaller than the starting number or the previously entered number on the keypad and divisible by 17 after subtraction from the trial’s starting number. If a subject produced an incorrect answer, we reset the starting number to the value of the incorrect answer, so as to assess the correctness of subsequent counting within the same trial. Correct answers and number of iterative calculations during the trial indicated performance in both mental arithmetic tasks. There was a maximum of four correct answers per trial. We imposed a minimum performance criterion, requiring an average of at least one correct numeric answer per trial in the Difficult task (that is, a minimum of six out of 24 correct answers throughout the experimental session; the Easy task generated virtually no incorrect answers). One participant failed to meet this requirement and was discarded.