As Fig. 3C demonstrates the increase in IFN-γ production associated with LLT1 activation becomes significant after 6 h and remains significant through 18 h post-stimulation. The same NK92 (rested overnight without IL-2):K562-CD161 IFN-γ production assay detailed selleck products earlier was now repeated in the presence of various

pharmacological inhibitors specific for various signalling mechanisms. As expected, inhibition of all cellular transcription using actinomycin D completely abrogated detectable production from our system (Fig. 4). This may be because of the inhibition of transcription of IFN-γ, or of various other gene products required for IFN-γ secretion or of both. Inhibition of Src-PTK with PP2 also abrogated IFN-γ production (Fig. 4). This was expected as Src-PTK acts to phosphorylate ITAMs on the accessory proteins associated with NK activating receptors, one of which LLT1 is likely to associate with [17]. Inhibition of the PKC pathway NVP-BEZ235 using bisindoylmaleimide I failed to significantly reduce IFN-γ production compared to the same reaction incubated with DMSO alone (Fig. 4). Additionally, inhibition of calcineurin using ascomycin and PI3K using LY294002 also failed to reduce IFN-γ production. When we inhibited the p38 MAPK pathway using SB203580, IFN-γ production was significantly reduced but not eliminated. This was also observed

when the MEK/ERK pathway was inhibited using PD98059 (Fig. 4). These results suggested that both the p38 and MEK/ERK pathways may be associated with LLT1-induced IFN-γ production. Use of pharmacological inhibitors on IFN-γ production suggested

that the p38 and MEK/ERK signalling pathways are associated with CD161 ligation of LLT1. Therefore, we hypothesized pheromone that upon binding NK92 with CD161 expressing target cells, we would observe increased phosphorylation of both p38 and ERK proteins compared to NK92 incubated with CD161 lacking target cells (Fig. 5A). Western blots were analysed by densitometry to confirm this increase in phospho-ERK associated with K562-CD161 and the results clearly demonstrate the increase in P-ERK over time associated with LLT1 ligation. (Fig. 5B). However, our western blot analysis was only capable of detecting an increase in phospho-ERK associated with K562-CD161 target cells. Phospho-p38 was detected in both NK92:K562-CD161 and NK92:K562-pCI-neo reactions (Fig. 5A). This does not entirely rule out the possibility that p38 is specifically associated with LLT1 downstream signalling. Our current LLT1 ligation system requires CD161 expressed on the surface of K562 to activate LLT1. As phospho-p38 is detectable in NK92 incubated with K562 targets lacking CD161, it is possible that any p38 phosphorylation associated with LLT1 ligation by CD161 is masked by p38 phosphorylation associated with the engagement of K562 by NK92. Note that because of paraformaldehyde fixing of K562-CD161/-pCI-neo, proteins detected via western blot are only from NK92.