Chem Rev 1995,95(1):69–96.CrossRef 55. Wang X, Zhi L, Mullen K: Transparent, conductive graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett 2007,8(1):323–327.CrossRef 56. Zhao D, Sheng G, Chen C, Wang X: DAPT Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under visible irradiation on graphene@TiO 2 dyade structure. Appl Catal, B 2012, 111–112:303–308. 57. Li Y, Wang W-N, Zhan Z, Woo M-H, Wu C-Y, Biswas P: Photocatalytic reduction of CO 2 with H 2 O on mesoporous silica supported Cu/TiO 2 catalysts. Appl Catal, B 2010,100(1–2):386–392. 58. Zhang N, Ouyang S, Kako T, Ye J: Mesoporous zinc germanium oxynitride for CO 2 photoreduction under visible light. Chem Commun 2012,48(9):1269–1271.CrossRef
Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions LLT and WJO conceived and designed the experimental Histone Methyltransferase inhibitor strategy. LLT performed the experiments and prepared the
manuscript. SPC and ARM supervised the whole work and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background For the advantages of low cost, environmental friendliness, easy fabrication, and light-to-energy conversion with relatively high efficiency, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are listed Selleckchem EPZ5676 as one of the most promising photovoltaic devices [1–6]. A typical DSSC has a sandwich structure: a dye-sensitized semiconductor photoanode, an electrolyte with a redox couple (triiodide/iodide), and a counter electrode (CE) catalyzing the reduction of I3 – to I-. The CE in photoelectrochemical solar cells plays an important role in transferring electrons from the Chorioepithelioma external
circuit back to the redox electrolyte for catalytic reduction of the redox electrolyte. Up to now, the most conventional CE is fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass coated with a thin layer of platinum, which has the excellent electrocatalytic activity for the reduction of charge carriers in an electrolyte as well as high conductivity. However, Pt is scarce and expensive which makes the cost of DSSCs high and limits the potential large-scale applications. To address this issue, efforts have been made to replace the Pt CE. Currently, the researches about a CE alternative were focused on two aspects. Firstly, different materials were tried to be used as CE in DSSC devices, such as carbon-based materials [7–9], conductive polymer [10, 11], and inorganic semiconductor materials [12–14]. Second, for the certain given CE materials, the effect of morphology on the efficiency of DSSC devices has received much attention. For example, in carbon-based CE materials, the different morphologies, such as nanotubes [15] and mesoporous [16] and hierarchical [17] structures, were used as CE in DSSC devices. However, for a special CE material, the influence of different phases on the efficiency of DSSC has not been reported.