Glover SJ, Eastell R, McCloskey EV, Rogers A, Garnero P, Lowery J, Belleli R, Wright TM, John MR (2009) Rapid and robust response of biochemical markers of bone formation to teriparatide therapy. Bone 45:1053–1058PubMedCrossRef”
“Introduction Osteoporosis is a chronic disorder
of skeletal fragility and impaired bone strength due to progressive loss of bone mass, resulting in thinning and increased porosity of cortical bone and disruption of trabecular architecture. These changes are the result of an imbalance in bone remodeling where bone resorption exceeds bone formation. The RANK/RANK ligand pathway is an important modulator of osteoclast activity [1–6]. Increased production of RANK ligand is implicated as a cause of increased bone remodeling in postmenopausal women [7, 8]. Denosumab (Prolia®, QNZ chemical structure Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) is a fully human IgG2 antibody that binds to RANK ligand with very high specificity [9]. By preventing the interaction of RANK ligand to its receptor RANK, denosumab is a potent anti-resorptive agent, decreasing the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts [2–5]. We have
previously demonstrated that denosumab treatment of postmenopausal women with low bone mass reduces bone remodeling and increases bone mineral density (BMD) [10–13]. In women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, denosumab therapy significantly reduced the risk of https://www.selleckchem.com/products/idasanutlin-rg-7388.html new vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures at 3 years compared with placebo [14]. This agent has received regulatory approval in many countries
for treating women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at increased risk or high risk for fracture. Anti-resorptive agents, including denosumab, prevent the progression of bone loss and improve bone strength but do not restore trabecular architecture or cure osteoporosis. The salutary effects of denosumab on bone turnover and BMD resolve quickly upon discontinuation of therapy PRKACG [12], meaning that continued, long-term therapy with denosumab is required to sustain the anti-fracture benefit. The results of the 4-year phase 2 dose-ranging study along with a 2-year interim analysis of the extension representing a total of 6 years of denosumab therapy have previously been reported [10–13]. Here, we report the final results of the 4-year extension of the phase 2 study, focusing on the skeletal effects, and safety and tolerability of denosumab in subjects who received continued denosumab therapy for a total of 8 years. Materials and methods The details of both the original 4-year phase 2 study and the extension study have already been published [10–13]. Those methods are summarized below. Study design The open-label, 4-year study extension was performed in 23 centers in the USA. An institutional review board Sapanisertib reviewed and approved the study protocol at each center, and all women provided written informed consent.