Lastly, support structures such as financial compensation and market GDC-0068 based incentive programs are important and should be in place to complement such conservation strategies right from the start (32:−1; 31:0). Factor 2 Factor summary: Factor 2 explains 14 % of the total variance and has an Eigen

value of 3.82. Nine respondents loaded significantly on this factor, of which five were male and four were female. Four respondents were from the Natura 2000 site, three from the landscape park and two from the national park site. This factor was loaded entirely by all protected area management authorities, NGOs representatives and municipality administrators (except one from the national park) from all three sites. No landowner/farmer loaded on this factor. Interpretation of factor 2: The Supporter—Private land is important to biodiversity conservation Private land should be treated as a priority in nature conservation strategies as they are crucial in conserving larger this website ecosystems and landscapes as a whole (12:+4). It is not the objective of private land conservation to undermine human needs and nor is it about restricting

people’s right over Staurosporine their land in perpetuity (27:−3; 4:−1); rather, it is based on the simple fact that private land often holds important biological resources and therefore, needs to be conserved (1:+3). People are generally good managers of their own land (which has sustained the important biodiversity on private land so far), but that should not be used as a pretext to make it a pure voluntary Metformin cost strategy and rely

solely on a landowner’s willingness to participate or not (5:0; 17:−4; 23:−2). Private land conservation does not harm a landowner as it doesn’t infringe on his property rights nor does it impact the income generation from the land (15:−4; 30:−1). Although it might not directly benefit the current land use and might even modify it, private land conservation has the potential to bring in new economic opportunities (13:−1; 25:−1; 29:+1). The primary challenges in promoting conservation on private land has been to negate the sense among landowners that their decision making power and authority over their land is being taken away, and to make them aware of the potential economic opportunities (16:+2; 18:+2). These two factors, along with the lack of adequate compensation schemes for landowners to offset the opportunity costs of conservation, have made private land conservation a challenge in Poland (3:−3). If private land is to be conserved on its own or in a mixed model of protected areas then the decision making process will need to be more inclusive and not limited to managing authorities alone (19:0; 11:−1).