*P < 0.05. Suppresion of miR-34a in Kazakh ESCC tissue To determine whether CpG methylation is accompanied by decreased miR-34a expression, we examined expression of miR-34a mRNA by real-time PCR in the same cohort (tumor n = 59; normal n = 34) used for the methylation analysis. The results,
consistent with our expectation, indicated that the miR-34a gene showed a nearly two-fold decrease in expression in Kazakh ESCC patients with a high level of methylation compared with that in normal tissues (0.079 ± 0.094 #PRN1371 research buy randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# vs. 0.277 ± 0.045, P < 0.0001; Figure 4). Figure 4 Average relative miR-34a expression level in ESCC compared with that in normal esophageal tissues. The expression level of miR-34a was measured by qRT-PCR and was normalized by U6RNA. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate, repeated three times. Error bars represent the standard error of mean, and asterisks represent a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). Correlation between promoter methylation and expression of miR-34a We analyzed the Spearman correlation between the methylation levels at individual CpG units and their expression. This analysis yielded 11 correlation coefficients [range: (−0.705) to (+0.263)] (Figure 5A). Notably, a significant inverse correlation was observed for CpG_4, CpG_6, CpG_8.9, CpG_14.15.16, CpG_19, and CpG_20 methylation and miR-34a expression (Figure 5B Savolitinib clinical trial and Table 3). A negative relationship between global miR-34a methylation
and mRNA expression was also observed in relation
to the overall methylation status of the miR-34a promoter and gene expression (r = −0.594, P = 0.042). These results demonstrated that the hypermethylation of the miR-34a promoter region might be the reason for the suppression of mRNA in Kazakh ESCC tissues. Figure 5 Negative correlation of miR-34a specific CpG units’ methylation and their expression. (A) Bar plot of Spearman correlation coefficient (r) showing Smoothened strength of negative correlation between miR-34a expression and methylation value of each CpG unit within miR-34a, with negative values representing inverse correlations and positive values representing positive correlations. Significant correlations (P < 0.05) are indicated in red. (B) Analysis of scatterplots and simple linear regression graphically displaying the correlation between methylation level of each CpG unit and miR-34a gene expression in Kazakh ESCC samples by Spearman correlation coefficient analysis. The straight line was the “best fit” that indicated the trend of relationship. Table 3 Correlation analysis of DNA methylation of individual CpG sites and miR-34a mRNA expression in Kazakh ESCC patients CpG unit CpG site Spearman’s correlation coefficient P value Unit1 CpG_1.2 −0.113 0.713 Unit2 CpG_3 0.253 0.363 Unit3 CpG_4 −0.705 0.005 Unit4 CpG_5 0.059 0.834 Unit5 CpG_6 −0.597 0.019 Unit7 CpG_8.9 −0.545 0.036 Unit9 CpG_14.15.16 −0.552 0.033 Unit10 CpG_17.18 −0.259 0.372 Unit11 CpG_19 −0.606 0.017 Unit12 CpG_20 −0.606 0.017 Unit15 CpG_23 −0.