pylori in this group of adolescents was high. However, there was no correlation between H. pylori and HAV infection rates. Hence, factors contributing to the transmission source and route seem to be
different. “
“This review summarizes studies on the epidemiology and public health implications of Helicobacter pylori published in peer-reviewed journals from April 2010 through March 2011. Prevalence rates vary widely between different geographical regions and ethnic groups. An interesting study from the USA identified the degree of African ancestry as an independent predictor of H. pylori infection. Two studies have demonstrated BGB324 concentration early childhood as the period of transmission of infection and identified an infected sibling as an important risk factor. An oral–oral route of spread has been substantiated with several studies showing the presence of H. pylori in the oral cavity. Studies have shown the presence of H. pylori in drinking water and the role of poor living conditions and sanitation in H. pylori infection, Selleckchem BVD-523 supporting an oral–fecal route of spread. Screening for H. pylori as a gastric cancer pre-screening strategy has been described in Japan, and the importance of H. pylori eradication as a gastric cancer–prevention strategy has now
been further emphasized in Japanese guidelines. Two studies have shown a decrease in the burden of dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease with H. pylori eradication. This article presents a review of the literature concerning the epidemiology and public health implications of Helicobacter pylori infection published from April 2010 till March 2011. The authors searched PubMed and Embase using MeSH terms “Helicobacter infections/epidemiology” and “Helicobacter infections/prevention and control”, and repeated the PubMed search independently using MeSH term “Helicobacter” alone
and using the set operator AND with the terms “Epidemiology”, MCE公司 “Prevalence”, “Incidence”, “Transmission”, “Risk Factors”, “Prevention and Control” or “Environment”. The identified literature is summarized below by subtopic: prevalence; incidence; transmission; risk factors; and public health implications. Serology was the most common method of diagnosis used in these studies, but several studies were endoscopy-based and diagnoses were then made by rapid urease test (RUT), culture, immuno-histochemistry or histology. A few studies utilized the urea breath test (UBT) or the stool antigen test (SAT). In an interesting and important study, Gong et al. [1] compared the accuracy of serological testing to histological diagnosis in a gastric cancer screening field survey in northern China. They found that serological testing using a commercially available kit and utilizing the recommended cut-off level underestimated the prevalence of H. pylori by almost 30% and emphasized the need for local validation of serological tests. We have grouped the studies according to the different geographical regions for ease of reference (Table 1).