Stimulus presentation and randomization were controlled using Presentation® software (Neurobehavioral Systems Inc, Albany, CA) running on a personal computer. Inter-trial timing was determined manually by the experimenter. To maintain the subject’s attention across the study, participants were instructed to decide whether the two stimuli in the pair were physically the ‘Same’ or ‘Different’, regardless of the self/other identity, by pressing two response buttons with the index finger of the left hand (Keenan et al., 2000a). Electromyographic (EMG) recordings were made NVP-BKM120 datasheet from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of the left

hand using a single differential surface EMG electrode, placed over the muscle belly. The ground electrode was placed over the left elbow. The EMG signal was amplified 1000 times with a BagnoliTM

System, band-filtered (25–250 Hz) with a sampling rate of 2 kHz and digitized using a BioPac MP100 system (http://www.biopac.com) and stored for off-line analysis. A MagStim Rapid2 stimulator (The Magstim Company, Carmarthenshire, Wales, UK) was used with a standard figure-of-eight, 70-mm-diameter Erastin clinical trial TMS coil. First, the individual optimal scalp position over the hand motor area of each subject was found by determining the scalp positioning at which the lower stimulation evoked the largest MEP. The intensity of single-pulse TMS was then adjusted to evoke MEPs with a mean peak-to-peak amplitude of ∼0.5 mV in a series of

ten consecutive pulses in the relaxed left FDI (baseline). To stimulate primary motor cortex, the coil was always placed tangentially to the scalp at a 45° angle to the midline to induce a posterior–anterior current flow across the central sulcus. Throughout the experimental session, the TMS coil was held in place by a mechanical arm fixed on an adjustable tripod, and one experimenter stood directly behind the subject and continuously monitored the coil position, correcting the position of the subjects’ head in case MAPK inhibitor of involuntary small head displacements. Based on results from a pilot study, magnetic pulses were randomly delivered at 300, 600 or 900 ms after the onset of the first picture in the pair and were triggered by the program used for stimuli presentation. The precise timing of stimulus onset and TMS triggering pulse were checked by means of an oscilloscope. Two baselines (ten pulses each) were acquired for each experimental block. The mean MEP amplitude of the baselines (i.e. before and after presentation of blocks) did not differ and were thus averaged to normalize MEP amplitude. Two baselines (ten pulses each) were acquired, one before and one after, for each experimental block. The mean of the baselines was calculated and used to normalize MEP amplitude. For each trial, MEP amplitude was expressed as a percentage of the mean peak-to-peak amplitude of the averaged baseline.