The results showed that interhemispheric synchronization was indeed significantly weaker

in the autism group not only in STG, but also in IFG (p < 0.05, randomization test and t test, see Experimental Procedures). None of the control ROIs exhibited significant differences between groups (Figure 3, top). Toddlers with language delay exhibited a trend for stronger selleck compound synchronization in LPFC, as compared with autism and control groups (p < 0.1, randomization test). Similar results were found when comparing only the youngest toddlers (Figure 3, right panels). Synchronization difference remained significant in STG (p < 0.05) and was almost significant in IFG (p < 0.07). The ROIs used in this analysis were selected manually in left and right hemispheres, and the left hemisphere ROIs were identical to those used in the seed analysis described above (Figure 1). The anatomical criteria

used for selection were identical in all groups, and there was, therefore, no bias for any of the ROIs to exhibit stronger interhemispheric correlations in one group or another. This lack of bias was evident in the equivalent ROI sizes (Figure S1) and locations (Table S1) across groups. Weak interhemispheric correlations in IFG and STG could be used to accurately identify the majority of toddlers with autism (Figure 3, bottom). We performed sensitivity-specificity and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses to determine the usefulness of IFG and STG correlations for autism classification (Figure S2). In these analyses, toddlers who exhibited a below-threshold correlation GDC-0199 mw value in either IFG or STG were classified as autistic, while those exhibiting above-threshold correlation values in both IFG and STG were classified as nonautistic (control or language delay). The accuracy

of the correlation-based classification was determined by comparing it with the actual clinical diagnosis performed by experienced psychologists. Selecting a correlation threshold/criterion of 0.38 enabled accurate classification of toddlers with autism, yielding a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 84%. In Tolmetin other words, 21 out of 29 toddlers in the autism group were correctly identified, while only 7 (5 control and 2 language delay) out of 43 nonautistic toddlers were mistakenly identified as autistic. When considering only the young toddlers, the same threshold yielded a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 80%. Interestingly, different subsets of toddlers with autism exhibited poor interhemispheric correlation in IFG and in STG. To ensure that weak interhemispheric correlation was not a consequence of our particular choice of ROI voxels, we examined single subject data in the toddlers with autism who exhibited the weakest interhemispheric correlations in IFG. We present the results for IFG, but equivalent results were found for STG in the autistic toddlers who exhibited the weakest STG correlations.