The survey indicates that the Chief Nursing Officer review has stimulated some activity in all organisations who responded. Eleven of the recommendations were ranked similarly by trusts and higher education institutions. There were statistically significant differences between trusts and higher education institution priorities

in four areas, inpatient care, evidence-based interventions, multidisciplinary team working and recruitment and retention.\n\nConclusions.\n\nThe findings of the survey demonstrate that all organisations have made some progress in the implementation of the Chief Nursing Officer recommendations. Trusts and higher education institutions broadly agree on the importance of each of the Chief Nursing Officer recommendations, with

learn more the exception of four items. A range of factors was identified by respondents that were perceived as facilitators and barriers to the implementation selleck screening library of the Chief Nursing Officer review.\n\nRelevance to clinical practice.\n\nThis article contains findings that are highly relevant for current and future clinical practice in mental health. Despite some progress, clear differences between higher education institutions and trusts are apparent. It is important that these differing perspectives are acknowledged and resolved to improve healthcare provision. Both trusts and higher education institutions reported difficulty with engaging service users and carers. www.selleckchem.com/products/cbl0137-cbl-0137.html A range of factors are identified that act as facilitators and barriers to the implementation of healthcare policy.”
“Objective: The aim of the study was to carry out a national survey in order to assess young people’s recognition and beliefs about treatment for depression, anxiety disorders and schizophrenia/psychosis.\n\nMethod: In 2011, telephone interviews were carried out with 3021 Australians aged between 15 and 25 years. Participants were presented with a case vignette describing either depression, depression with suicidal thoughts, depression with alcohol misuse, psychosis/schizophrenia, social phobia or post-traumatic

stress disorder (PTSD). Questions were asked about what was wrong with the person, help-seeking intentions and the likely helpfulness of a broad range of interventions.\n\nResults: Rates of recognition of depression were relatively high, with almost 75% of respondents using the correct label. Rates of recognition for the psychosis (schizophrenia) and PTSD vignettes were similar, with around one third of respondents using the correct labels. Only 3% of respondents were able to correctly label social phobia. Intentions to seek help were highest for depression with suicidal thoughts and lowest for social phobia, with family members nominated the most likely sources of help across all vignettes.\n\nConclusions: Most young people believe in the importance of seeking professional help and they have good recognition of depression.